New York Times, Artists work for free? Most say “No.”
“When a company like Google comes out very publicly and expects that the market would just give them free artwork, it sets a very dangerous precedent.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/15/business/media/15illo.html?_r=1
This is a great article. Thoughts?
June 15th, 2009 at 11:30 am
This is a bit like asking Russell Crowe or Angelina Jolie to do a movie for free because it will be great exposure. How twisted!
June 15th, 2009 at 11:31 am
Saw this posted on FB this morning…thanks for picking up on it Scott.
J
June 15th, 2009 at 4:20 pm
This video is a good comparison, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2a8TRSgzZY
June 17th, 2009 at 9:48 am
a friend in the real estate biz responded that it should be up to the artist. I agreed. I also suggested that it would be like a millionaire approaching him to sell his/her house, but suggesting that he wave his commission because he could say that he sold his/her house. It would certainly be his choice.